Joe's Random Ramblings - Latest comments on AT&T doesn't like IPv6

In response to: AT&T doesn't like IPv6

tom scholl [Visitor] — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:29:18 +0000

Just because the traceroute "dies", doesn't mean that routing is broken between AT&T and HE. I am able to ping the HE anycast service just fine from several locations within AT&T Internet Services (AS7132). Anyhow, I left you an email via the contact link on your blog offering some help. Let me know.

In response to: AT&T doesn't like IPv6

Joe [Member] — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:30:11 +0000

Yes, I have come across that link as well, and pointed it out to the tech support guy while I was still in the online chat with him.
My guess is they are going to charge extra for it, though :(

In response to: AT&T doesn't like IPv6

Charles Wyble [Visitor] — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:52:32 +0000

http://www.corp.att.com/gov/solution/network_services/data_nw/ipv6/ appears to support that AT&T is building a v6 peer/tunnel.

Sorry if it seems I'm spamming your blog. This is just so cool and your the first person with a half way decent post on the issue.

In response to: AT&T doesn't like IPv6

Charles Wyble [Visitor] — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:50:59 +0000

You should try posting on NANOG about this. I imagine they would be quite interested.

This is exciting.... they actually might be setting up a v6 tunnel broker on this continent! :)

In response to: AT&T doesn't like IPv6

Charles Wyble [Visitor] — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:47:28 +0000

This is very very very interesting. AT&T / HE handoff broken. How drool.

I have resorted to just doing OpenVPN and GRE tunnels these days. *sighs*

Would be nice if you could send ipcpv6 and get a /64 from the PoP. :) I keep meaning to try that and see if it's that simple.

Please keep us posted on your issue.